The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts illustrate average proportion of sodium, saturated fat and added sugar in typical in the USA. Breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks are involved in invested meals.
As is seen from the given illustration, most of sodium and saturated fat are taken in dinner, while added sugar content is highest in snacks. On the contrary, the consumption of three nutrients is smallest in breakfast.
As for the absorption of sodium, the consumption of it is largest in dinner, occupying 43% of the total intake, which is 14% larger than the share of sodium consumed in lunch. Breakfast and snacks both contain 14% of the sodium, which is approximately half of the share of sodium in dinner. Dinner is also loaded with saturated fat(37%), followed by the figure in lunch at 26%. The amount of fat is relatively small in snacks and breakfast, accounting for 21% and 16% respectively.
In the other hand, people ingest highest level of added sugar when having snacks, making up 42% of overall added sugar consumption, while the figure in dinner is only 20%. Compared with dinner, lunch contains slightly lower proportion of the sugar, and people only take 16% of it during breakfast.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 11
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- Some people think climate change has a negative impact on business, while others think that it provides more business opportunities. Discuss both views and give you own opinion. 61
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- In some countries, the criminal trials are shown on the TV and the general public can watch them. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 27, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'ingest the highest'.
Suggestion: ingest the highest
...ctively. In the other hand, people ingest highest level of added sugar when having snacks...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, as for, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.025 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66382713403 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1039883774 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0458168517337 0.215688989381 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227550653937 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351062858109 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0372686523646 0.15604864568 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326111815221 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.