The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
One chart illustrates the trends of how many families owned electrical appliances in a particular country between 1920 and 2019. The other represents number of hours per week spent on household chores during the same period.
In general, not many families used to have fridge and vacuum cleaner. But they became increasingly reliable towards the 21st century. Another interestingly fact is that nowadays, people have relied on appliances and reduced their hours for housework significantly.
Washing machine had the highest ownership (40%) in 1920. The figure improved dramatically to 70% in the first 40 years. Despite declining slightly in 1980, it rebounded back to roughly 75% in 2019. Regarding refrigerator, merely any family bought it at first. The same goes for vacuum cleaner which was owned by only one-third of home. However, both got consistently popular and became must-have household appliances in 2019.
On average, in 1920, families dedicated 50 hours for chores. There was a constant drop to just around 15 in 1980 and it levelled off until 2000. Following this, it dipped marginally to 10 hours and ended the period.
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this a positive or a negative development 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 84
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole 84
- Many people feel that urban environments are more unhealthy than they have ever been What do you think are the main causes of this problem What measures can be effective in tackling this problem 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, regarding, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7795030132 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.708791208791 0.547539520022 129% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.0261608097 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.7142857143 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 22.9334400587 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207983655681 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578286728313 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839081296274 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122070685024 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108255147712 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 61.2550243902 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.51 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.