The charts below show the changes in ownership of the electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari

The two line graphs illustrate the proportion of families owning three different kinds of modern machines (washing machine, refrigerator, Vacuum cleaner) and how much time was spent each household weekly from 1920 to 2019.
Overall, there was an upward trend of households’ using electrical appliances whilst the opposite was true for the number of hours every week one family used for housework.
Beginning with 40% in 1920, the percentage of house owners having washing machines was, highest, compared with 30% of those with vacuum cleaners. The next 48 years witnessed a significant increase of 30% in the proportion of households purchasing washing machine, which slightly fluctuated from onwards. In addition, vacuum cleaners became more and more popular during the period when families with such machine accounted for 90% in 1980, and even up to 100% only 20 years later. Since then, all families used vacuum cleaner to assist them with housework. Most remarkably, from the fact that no one used refrigerators in 1920, the figure soared to 90% of houses with this useful machine after 40 years, reaching the peak of 100% during the last four decades.
On the contrary, with the assistance advanced appliances, domestic work took each family less time to finish every week. Particularly, at the commencing of the time period, every household had to spend 50 hours a week doing house work, followed by a remarkable chop of 30 hours in 1960. Subsequently, the figure continued to decrease gradually, ending the course with only 10 hours on the weekly basis.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, in addition, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16535433071 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.669047442 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 106.607317073 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622047244094 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7720492495 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.2 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10016695893 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411107818695 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353959918443 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0736396301576 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289027517611 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.