The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990 2000 and 2010

Essay topics:

The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the National University in the years 1990, 2000, and 2010.

Certificates at the National University, which were given in numerous fields are shown in the graphs below between the late nineteenth and the early 2000s. Participants were interested more in studying pharmacy, medicine and computer science.

Overall, there was a significant growth in the number of students who had studied Computer Science whilst those who took part in medicine had varied throughout the whole period.

As we can see in the charts below, University students who joined Computer Science had outnumbered any other field as their number accounted for less than a third and increased moderately to two-fifth, reaching its peak in the early 2000s to be almost half. Whereas graduates, who had received Law certificates witnessed fluctuation through the whole period with a significant plummet in 2000 to be only one in ten.

Moreover, the proportion of students, who showed interest in Medicine percentage varied from a quarter to have a moderate rise in 2000, and then recover to a quarter after one decade. Additionally, Business students’ number had declined sharply reaching its lowest by the end of 2010. Also, there was a significant plunge in studying Business and Law compared to other subjects.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-03-11 tata 78 view
2020-11-01 Luta 78 view
2020-11-01 Luta 78 view
2019-09-16 ralfs 84 view
2019-02-08 Valeria Surkina 78 view
Essays by user tata :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Certificates at the National University,...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...armacy, medicine and computer science. Overall, there was a significant growth...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ad varied throughout the whole period. As we can see in the charts below, Univ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...plummet in 2000 to be only one in ten. Moreover, the proportion of students, ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, then, third, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30769230769 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8699902755 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625641025641 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5927933588 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.375 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12255670811 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479859843905 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509910600671 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688801697715 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043776445446 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.