The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing anf industrialised country in 1980 and 1990.
The three bar chart illustrates average year of schooling, scientists and technicians and spending on research and development between 1980 and 1990.
It us clearly evident that industrialised country rate always higher tham developing countries in all categories. Spending of the research and development in developing countries showed a downward trend.
In developing countries average year of schooling were at about 2.5 year while their counter part rate was higher and it was almost 8.5 years in 1980. After a decade, both of the rate plumated and industry economy based country reached at peak.
Secondly, industry economy based country had at about 42 scientists in per thousand but economy growing countries had only 10 scientists in a thousand. The scientists rate of both countries soared by approximately 5 and 25 ina thousand after a decade.
Industrialised country spended more money than developing countries. In 1980, developed country invested almost 160 US billion but developing countries invested at about 90 US billion which is less than his opponent. After a decade both of them showed an opposite trend. Developed Countries showed more upward trend and it turned into almost 350 US billion. On the other hand developing countries showed downward tendency ; they invested only 50 US billion which is 30 US billion less than previous investment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nward trend. In developing countries average year of schooling were at about ...
^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lmost 8.5 years in 1980. After a decade, both of the rate plumated and industry e...
^^
Line 6, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed country reached at peak. Secondly, industry economy based country had at ab...
^^
Line 6, column 229, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...es soared by approximately 5 and 25 ina thousand after a decade. Industrialised count...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 121, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...eveloped country invested almost 160 US billion but developing countries invested at ab...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 178, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...oping countries invested at about 90 US billion which is less than his opponent. After ...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...illion which is less than his opponent. After a decade both of them showed an opposit...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 351, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... trend and it turned into almost 350 US billion. On the other hand developing countrie...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 452, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ard tendency ; they invested only 50 US billion which is 30 US billion less than previo...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 475, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ested only 50 US billion which is 30 US billion less than previous investment.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, secondly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39534883721 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8978227246 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53023255814 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6701720984 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6666666667 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256760510901 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116307853359 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595363491855 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153525204594 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694778333225 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.