The pie chart shows electricity production in two countries from 1980 and 2000
The pie chart compares the using fossil fuel in order to produce electricity in two specific countries between 1980 and 2000.
It is clearly evident that, at the beginning Australia produced more electricity and used Coal for it while at the ending France produced more electricity and used more Nuclear Power as a source of energy.
In 1980, Australia produced 100 units of electricity ; for producing it they used four specific ingredients. At that time, they used more Coal which rate was 50 units out of 100 units. Hydro power and Natural Gas used as same proportion to production of it. Only 10 units of energy comes from Oil. After two decades total production of electricity augmented by 70 unit; the majority of electricity came from Coal which was 130 units. Using rate of Hydro power extended by 16 units and other ingredients rate dwindled by 18 units and 10 units respectively.
France provided 90 units of electricity to her consumers. Large proportion of energy comes from Coal in 1980 but it remained static 25 units in 2000. Only 15 units of electricity comes from Nuclear Power but these rate were changed dramatically and soared by 111 units. Natural Gas and Hydro Power rate also plunged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and 2000. It is clearly evident that, at the beginning Australia produced more...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90291262136 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63237597111 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514563106796 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6514277487 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1666666667 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240943880763 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100333298949 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111619445298 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185283902134 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133220299623 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.