The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart clearly illustrates the visitors and the graph percentage to Australia within the period of ten years from 1985 to 1995. And the graph indicates the share of the Australia's share of the Japanese tourist.

Taking a glance at the chart, in 1985 the number of tourist increased to 4.5 and continued adding slightly more above 10 in 1990 and descended downward in 1991. It went up in 1992 and kept rising to 12 in 1993 which clearly showcase the increase in the number of the tourist.

Moreover, in 1994, it went up to more than 12 and sky rotted to 14.5 in 1995. Meanwhile, the Australia's distribution of the market are clearly shown in the graph by percentage which in 1985 was at 2 percent. It continued adding gradually to about 4.5 in 1989 and decreased downward in 1990. Therefore, the number of the visitors pick up in growing in 1991 and keep adding in growth to about 6.2 as the highest percentage in 1994 and then came down in 1995.

In conclusion, the Japanese tourist increased rapidly while the Australia's share also popped up and later slightly decreased in 1995.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-10-24 Martini 73 view
2021-10-24 Martini 67 view
2021-04-25 sattar_iust 92 view
2019-08-13 Shidbi 89 view
Essays by user Martini :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65463917526 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56144077621 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484536082474 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3443637007 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238310889987 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108105920722 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876777879113 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165904378011 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645600213278 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65463917526 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56144077621 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484536082474 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3443637007 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238310889987 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108105920722 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876777879113 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165904378011 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645600213278 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.