A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
As someone's worth these days are judged according to social level and acquired material in his or her possession. And making old ways of taking note of people's value like honor, kindness and trust are no longer taken as the relevant points. This essay will treat the clear and reasonable point that can be used to evaluate someone's worth.
Firstly, people presently are being judged according to their physical materials possession by most people like houses, cars, and so many other enticing assets especially when they throw money around. For example, like one of the Nigerian popular artists by name Davido or Peter and paul called square who has made money from the entertainment industry. Most people will judge them from what they have as highly placed people and having known their social class.
Secondly, while some other people will regard those with trust and honor better as they have affected lots of lives positively. Honor and trust are noted as the points towards human evaluation as regards worth as such people add value to most people around them. it is much better and valued to add value to people instead of throwing money around to impress people especially ladies.
Moreover, in my own opinion, I regard those with honor and trust more than those in possession of houses and cars as that marks them or singles them out as men or women with integrity. And they are highly respected as it pays to be honored and trusted instead of being into a social class where trust is not achieved.
In conclusion, this treated how someone's worth is judged according to social class and material possession and old ways evaluating people's worth through trust, honor, and kindness as the best as these adds more value to people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-04 | tsln7607 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-15 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | ThanhNT | 89 | view |
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 67
- Every year more and more students choose to study online rather than attend classes on campus What do you think are the causes of this What solution can you bring 73
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...e add value to most people around them. it is much better and valued to add value ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, as regards, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26740616644 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552188552189 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2283889567 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21976952642 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917301997489 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528510432566 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145253576608 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640426166893 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.