The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant
The bar chart clearly illustrates the visitors and the graph percentage to Australia within the period of ten years from 1985 to 1995. And the graph also indicates the Australia's share of the Japanese tourist.
Taking a glance at the chart, in 1985 the number of tourist increased to 4.5 which isn't bad at this initial point and continued adding slightly more above 10 in 1990 and descended downward in 1991. It went up in 1992 and kept rising to 12 in 1993 which clearly showcased the increase in the number of the tourist which is greatly encouraging.
Moreover, in 1994, it perfectly went up to more than 12 and sky rotted to 14.5 in 1995. Meanwhile, the Australia's distribution of the market are clearly shown in the graph by the degree of the percentage which in 1985 was at 2 percent which was discouraging. But, it continued adding gradually to about 4.5 in 1989 creating a positive impression and all of a sudden decreased downward in 1990. Therefore, the number of the visitors pick up in growth within in 1991 and keep adding in growth to about 6.2 as the highest percentage in 1994 and then came down in 1995 which created a negative impression.
In conclusion, the Japanese tourist increased rapidly while the Australia's share also popped up and later slightly decreased in 1995.
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Every year more and more students choose to study online rather than attend classes on campus What do you think are the causes of this What solution can you bring 73
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists traveling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia s share of the Japanese tourist market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...umber of tourist increased to 4.5 which isnt bad at this initial point and continued...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1075.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75663716814 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66668828469 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504424778761 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0258591763 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.444444444 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20056216605 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09746763677 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821398434648 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150655710185 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667782117927 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.