The charts below show the proportions of british students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart depicts the percentage of bilingual British students in 2000 and 2010 , who spoke other languages than English. It is very clear from the chrt that Spanish grew in popularity while French lost its importance as second language to be spoken.
Earlier, Spanish was spoken by 30 percentage of British students in 2000 which than grew in popularity by 5.percentage in 2010. A similar trend was observed in students who spoke Another language. Also the pupils speaking Two other languages saw an increase of 5 percentage in 2010 as compared to that in 2000 - which was 10 percentage.
However, the percentage of students speaking German remained constant at 10 percentage in the respective years.
On the other hand, the number of students speaking French came down at 10 percentage in 2010 from that of 15 percentage in 2000. In addition to this, even the few people who spoke No other language than English were found to be 10 percentage less in 2010 than that of 20 percentage in 2000.
Thus, it is evident from the chart that students speaking Spanish, Another language and Two other languages saw an increase in its demand whereas French language and students who spoke no other languge decreased with the constant percentage of German speakers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Some people claim that not enough of waste from homes is recycled. They say that only way to increase recycling is for governments to mke it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste.? 73
- The charts below show the proportions of british students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,make comparisons 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ingual British students in 2000 and 2010 , who spoke other languages than English....
^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...in students who spoke Another language. Also the pupils speaking Two other languages...
^^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 - which was 10 percentage. However, the percentage of students speaking Germ...
^^
Line 11, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...spective years. On the other hand, the number of students speaking French c...
^^
Line 11, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...percentage in 2000. In addition to this, even the few people who spoke No other l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, so, thus, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0141509434 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66540352068 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47641509434 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8772713469 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254189049159 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134054872962 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728340434325 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165504583597 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449021929237 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.