The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996
The charts given below illustrate the percentage of expenditures patterns in US between 1966 and 1996.
Overall, the spending patterns in US which had the highest value was cars. While the lowest had computers and books.
To begin, from 1966, the largest proportion of expenditures most money was spent on food with amount 44%. These followed by cars used 23% in one year. The smallest consumed was on furniture at 10%, petrol 9%, restaurants used 7%, books 6%, the last spending was 1%.
On the other hand, in 1996 the percentage of pattern there was increase and fell down. Food was the highest proportion in 1966 but it had fallen to 33% of the total. The second hugest was cars grow to 22% from 1966. While for the smallest category not change significantly such as furniture reduce to 2%, petrol was go down to 1%, restaurant go up to 7%, books decrease to 5%, and computers climbed to 9% for 10%.
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 56
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies.Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this. 56
- The table below give information on the proporion of carbohydrates, protein, and fat in three different diets. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est had computers and books. To begin, from 1966, the largest proportion of exp...
^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gone'.
Suggestion: gone
...h as furniture reduce to 2%, petrol was go down to 1%, restaurant go up to 7%, boo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 748.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64596273292 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49340010739 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614906832298 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6244197669 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.8 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247407367636 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107978522391 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157331559808 0.0843802449381 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209001278554 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198008739494 0.0819641961636 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.