The charts below show what percentage of their daily intake of various nutrients the average person in the USA consumes in each meal and in snacks These nutrients may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
The charts illustrate the proportion of everyday consumption of sodium, saturated fats and added sugar of an average person residing in USA in each meal.
Overall, it can be interpreted that maximum percentage of sugar is consumed in snacks whereas sodium and saturated fat are consumed the highest during dinner. Also, breakfast meal has the least percentage of daily intake of all the nutrients.
From the charts, it can be analyzed that the consumption of sodium and saturated fats are approximately similar. For breakfast and snacks, sodium intake is equal to 14%. For lunch and dinner the intake of sodium is 29% and 43% respectively. On the other hand, saturated fat intake is the least for breakfast which is 16%. For lunch and snacks, the percentage intake of snacks is 26% and 21% respectively. Dinner intake for saturated fat is the maximum at 37%.
42% of added sugar is consumed during snack which is the highest proportion of that nutrient for a particular meal. 23% of added sugar is consumed during dinner where as 16% and 19% where consumed at breakfast and lunch respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...f added sugar is consumed during dinner where as 16% and 19% where consumed at breakfast...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00543478261 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75846673083 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445652173913 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0582874224 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7272727273 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195143899714 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848541632392 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054700146666 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139630312464 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437270051874 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.