The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The best way a person improves in any job is by learning from their mistakes. Every human needs advice and a push in the right direction to achieve success. By saying this I would like to disagree with the issue stated that a person’s negative actions should be ignored and only positive actions be praised. Be it an educator or a parent, they would want their pupil to be the best of the lot and the best of a person can be brought out by rectifying their wrongdoings and knowing right thing.
From the perspective of a child, they assume to be doing the right thing all the time. If the negative actions of a child are not made clear to them, it might deeply affect their behavior. For example, if your child hits adults and that negative action is not curbed at home, it will be imprinted in their brains that hitting adults is not a wrong thing and this would affect their behavior as grownups.
If a person’s wrongdoings are not pointed out, it will not help them get any better at their task. This could clearly be explained through the training of an athlete. As a person begins training in any sport, it is only from what they did wrong that they will know what they should do right. If a trainer does not point their faults, the athlete shall never reach the expertise they need to compete against the world. There would be no Messi or Roanldo or Serena if their trainer only told them what they were good at. Every multinational company has dedicated time to give authentic feedback. These feedbacks do not only hold praises for your positive actions but also what your negative actions were that did not get you to those star rating that everybody dreams for. A person must take this constructive criticism in a positive way to develop.
Small scale negative actions when ignored might exacerbate the problem making it tough to control later. Prevention is better than cure they say. Be it studying for an exam or for that matter, anything that you do in life as fun or for achieving any of your goals, you will need somebody who will point at your wrongdoings. And only from that will you learn to do anything right. Finally, as much as it is important to praise positive actions, it is equally important to criticize negative actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 676, Rule ID: YOUR[1]
Message: Did you mean 'you're' or 'you are'?
Suggestion: you're; you are
...for your positive actions but also what your negative actions were that did not get ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 819, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n must take this constructive criticism in a positive way to develop. Small scale negative act...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 406.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57389162562 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35979744587 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487684729064 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2195575487 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.85 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193663956653 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060456831173 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703655237229 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126959827835 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566861595156 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.