The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following charts provide some information about the number of UK graduate and postgraduate students engagements after college apart from full-time work in 2008.
As can be clearly observed from the first graph, despite the fact that almost 30000 graduate students selected to pursue their further study in 2008, 3500 of them picked voluntary work after finishing college at same year. In addition, the number of graduate students who either involved in part-time work or didn’t have any job was approximately equal, 17735 and 16233 respectively.
Regarding the second graph, while unemployed postgraduate students were 1625, far fewer postgraduate students, the exact number was 345, preferred to do voluntary work in 2008. At the same year, both part-time work and further study were more popular among postgraduate students. 2535 of postgraduate students chose to deal with the former one and 2725 of those students were interested in higher level studies.
It is clear from the graphs that the destination patterns of both graduate and postgraduate students were downright similar in 2008. Eventually it seems that by multiplying the numbers of postgraduate students we can virtually reach the graduate students graph.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-03 | Nowshin Tabassum | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | jhanvimody | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | shalin63 | view | |
| 2023-08-25 | shalin63 | view | |
| 2023-08-25 | shalin63 | view |
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy Is it a blessing or curse 88
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map below shows the development of the village Write a report for a university lecturer describing the development of the village 84
- Rather than choose a subject that is suitable for future employment possibilities you should choose a subject that you interested in or could get good grades Agree or disagree 83
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Teenagers should receive lessons on principles of personal finance such as investing and debt To what extent do you agree with this statement 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, second, so, while, apart from, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48947368421 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82001650257 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7074829828 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.375 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258409743477 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127491597104 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739850779066 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187280982653 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765448060272 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.