The charts compare the number of people per household in the UK
in 1981 and 2001
The charts give information about the proportions of six different types of families in the UK during the period from 1981 to 2001.
Overall, there were upward trends in the percentage of one and two-member households while the figures for the other groups experienced a reverse pattern over the given period. It is also clear that the two-member family was considered the most common one in the United Kingdom.
Starting at 17%, the rate of single-person households increased noticeably to 26% in 2001. At the same time, there was a similar trend in terms of families of two people, increasing from 31% to 34%.
In comparison, 20% of British people lived in households which had three members, followed by 18% regarding families of four. Afterwards, the figures for these two groups decreased slightly by 3% in the following 20 years. Similarly, those living in five and six-people households accounted for only 8% and 6% respectively. 20 years later, there was a slight drop of 2% for the former and 4% for the latter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
- WITHOUT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT THE DEATH PENALTY OUR LIVES ARE LESS SECURE AND CRIMES OF VIOLENCE INCREASE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IS ESSENTIAL TO CONTROL VIOLENCE IN SOCIETY TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 78
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 78
- The charts show the difference in how three countries learn English in 2010 and 2015 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91954022989 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79173136915 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632183908046 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8181321712 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141120488662 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603779644675 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681684566258 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933917718391 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702377562143 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.