The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The chart provides information about the average levels of participating in education and highest education level according to the ministry of education in Singapore between 2000 to 2010.
Overall, what stands out from both graphs is that were notable upwards trends in the average number of spent years in education people in both male and female .
By contrast , there were a considerable increase of both male and female numbers of being educated while in the same time there’s an interesting point in which the females percentage are always less than the mans one .
Looking at the details in the 20th the high school qualification was taking nearly a third percent of the educated people while in the other side in 2010 nearly the same percent was taken by the university students although there is massive reduction between the percentage of primary school qualification in both years in early 20th it was taking roughly a quarter of the educated population while in the opposite side it only included a tiny fraction ..
- The chart below gives the percentage of social media users by age in Jamestown in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features Write at least 150 words 73
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 78
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people say that the increasing use of modern technology has made work a lot easier and quicker to accomplish Others however argue that it has only made people busier 84
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20 in the last ten years Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion in Singapore between 2000 to 2010. Overall, what stands out from both graph...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...education people in both male and female . By contrast , there were a cons...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion people in both male and female . By contrast , there were a considerable ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...th male and female . By contrast , there were a considerable increase of b...
^^
Line 8, column 165, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'females'' or 'female's'?
Suggestion: females'; female's
...ere’s an interesting point in which the females percentage are always less than the man...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 217, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...entage are always less than the mans one . Looking at the details in the 20...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge are always less than the mans one . Looking at the details in the 20th the h...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent was taken by the university students although there is massive reduction betw...
^^
Line 11, column 455, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...e side it only included a tiny fraction ..
^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...de it only included a tiny fraction ..
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 876.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15294117647 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70178520275 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 22.4926829268 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.550786897 43.030603864 273% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 219.0 112.824112599 194% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.5 22.9334400587 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326237077058 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224943790551 0.103423049105 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.251372154479 0.0843802449381 298% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224943790551 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.251372154479 0.0819641961636 307% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.1 13.2329268293 182% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.85 61.2550243902 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 10.3012195122 191% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.48 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.9970731707 171% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.