The charts show average levels of participation and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The charts indicate the norm pitch of participation in education, and the highest education magnitude of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The bar chart simplifies the significant rise in years spent at school for the adult males, while the steadiness, or the very insignificant one for the adult females. However, the two pie charts trace education volume over the same time, using different colours and fractions that represent different categories of qualifications.
By checking the bars vertically; the blue for the adult males and the orange for the adult females, it’s plain to see that the average of years attended at school for both men and women started approximately the same in 2000. It kept the general run till 2004. Then, by 2008, it’s started to go upward for men, while roughly for women. In 2010, men surpassed women at education. Unfortunately, adult females didn’t go that far at schools.
Apparently, the increase wasn’t only in the years spent at school, it was also in the quality of qualifications. The qualifications attained have been intensified. The majority in 2010, represented by the grey colour (over thirty), used to just finish the high school. While earning a master’s degree was seldom, figured by a tiny fraction (7%). In 2010, the measure of master qualification got the utmost scale, almost got tripled, coloured with the navy blue. Definitely, the awareness of better education grew higher over years.
- Some people believe that using taxpayer funds to look for life on their planets is important Others however think that it s a waste of public money because there are much more important issues requiring funding on our own planet Discuss both views and giv 61
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 56
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram details the process of making leather products 73
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The charts indicate the norm pitch of pa...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore. The bar chart simplifies the significant...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ifferent categories of qualifications. By checking the bars vertically; the blu...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...females didn’t go that far at schools. Apparently, the increase wasn’t only in ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15189873418 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90511155196 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607594936709 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.7712463941 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2142857143 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9285714286 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188846815362 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613751312167 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951757368562 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155851909718 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1336084521 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The charts indicate the norm pitch of pa...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore. The bar chart simplifies the significant...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ifferent categories of qualifications. By checking the bars vertically; the blu...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...females didn’t go that far at schools. Apparently, the increase wasn’t only in ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 965.302439024 126% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15189873418 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90511155196 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607594936709 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.7712463941 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2142857143 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9285714286 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188846815362 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613751312167 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951757368562 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155851909718 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1336084521 0.0819641961636 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.