The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The chart illustrates the average level of participation in education and educational levels of adults between 2000 and 2010 in Singapore.
Overall, it can be seen that the bar chart had an upward trend for both males and females. While the pie chart witnessed a dramatic increase in university qualification proportion and the opposite was primary school qualification.
As can be seen from the bar chart, in 2000, males and females spent 9 and 8 years at school, respectively. During the following years, the number of years spent by men experienced a constant rise and reached its highest point just below 12 years in 2010. After remaining stable from 2000 to 2004, the number of years females spent at schools rose rapidly to over 8 in 2010.
With the pie chart, the proportion of adults in master and university qualifications was the same when it rose sharply to 30.31% and 32.93%, respectively. By contrast, secondary and high school qualifications witnessed a decrease and it ranked fourth and third in 2010. At the bottom of the list, the percentage of primary school qualifications was at 2.1%.
- the maps show changes that took place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001 78
- More and more people want to buy clothes car and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- Big salary is more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 11
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 67
- Some people think that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...posite was primary school qualification. As can be seen from the bar chart, in 20...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01868541767 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556756756757 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1311684358 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280009433843 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130666578765 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.206073312217 0.0843802449381 244% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222228895817 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.260193373091 0.0819641961636 317% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.