The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The chart illustrates average levels of participation and highest education levels of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
Overall, the bar chart indicates that both genders saw a positive increase, while the pie chart reveals a shift in educational qualifications in the population. These changes could indicate a change in the population's overall educational attainment.
The bar chart shows the average number of years spent at school for adult males significantly increased over the number of years spent at school for adult females.
The pie chart shows that in 2000 university qualifications comprised 8,3% of the population, but in 2010 they exceeded 32,93%. In addition, master qualification also increased 30,31%. In 2000, primary school qualifications were 25,77%, but in 2010 they were reduced by 2,1%. And then, in 2000 the number of high school graduates was 32,13% while in 2010 it fell to 19,55%. The percentage of those with no qualifications decreased from 33,77% in 2000 to 15,61% in 2010. The overall percentage of people with university qualifications increased significantly over the period.
- It has been suggested that all young adults should be required to undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community Would the drawbacks be greater than benefits to the community and the young adults themselves 76
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 73
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 73
- The table below shows the number of motor vehicles per 1 000 inhabitants in eight countries in 1990 and 2000
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43103448276 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15284758266 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534482758621 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6071194512 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372494401077 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147620528827 0.103423049105 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.209908931834 0.0843802449381 249% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286042076065 0.15604864568 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.274635720587 0.0819641961636 335% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.