The charts show favourite social media channels in China in 2011, 2012, 2013. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts illustrate the proportion of five different social media platforms that people used from 2011 to 2013.
In general, the use of Facebook began to decline in 2011 and continued on this downward turn over the three years; however, Facebook always ranks first place. In addition, the four others witnessed an upward trend.
In the year 2011, Facebook stood at 59% which was the highest rate. Moreover, it is also three times as high as the figure for Twitter which was 21%. At the same time, the proportion of Google+ and Pinterest was identical stood at 5% and exactly a half of that of LinkedIn.
In the year following, meanwhile the rate of Facebook experienced a noticeable decrease by 10%, the others include Pinterest and LinkedIn and Twitter improved slightly about 1% to 2%. Especially Google+ rose dramatically which is double as high as the figure in 2011.
After two years since 2011, even though Facebook was at the highest level, it still underwent a remarkable fall to 38%. Besides, all of the others seemed to rose significantly when comparing the figures of 2013 with 2011; however, in three years, the proportion of Pinterest was the lowest rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | duykhanh3204 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-23 | Nguyên-MTTN | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | 100 | view |
- Most world s problems are caused by over population To what extent do you agree of disagree 89
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 84
- The bar chart shows the number of people who visited different museums in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowasays alarge amount of advertising is aimed at children Some people think this can have negative effects on children and should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Although more and more people read news on the internet newspaper will remain the main source of news for the majority ofpeople To what extent do you agree of disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r others witnessed an upward trend. In the year 2011, Facebook stood at 59% wh...
^^
Line 9, column 130, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...went a remarkable fall to 38%. Besides, all of the others seemed to rose significantly whe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94527363184 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55955523227 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592039800995 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.2240518737 43.030603864 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.444444444 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0799444203121 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393369648866 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499302016725 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0574821619503 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583778834567 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.