The charts show information concerning speed-camera use, together with statistics on road accidents, for the city of Melbourne.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given charts depict the increase in speed-camera uses and changes in the data of cars accidents in Melbourne between 2002 and 2005.
Overall, the number of camera uses went up through years and there was a considerable surge in the latter years. The percentage of road accidents fluctuated but they have increased in total.
Commencing with the use of measuring-cameras, in the first year, there were only about 25 cameras in the city and just over 10 cameras were brought into use in the next year. However, in 2004, the number of them was doubled and increased significantly in the final year, at around 150 cameras, about 6 times compared to 2002.
Turning to the changes in car-related problems, in early 2002, there were only 3% and below 1% of accidents and deaths respectively. But in the next years, the deaths on roads were steadily the same, except for the second half of 2005, there was a small fluctuation and ended up at 1%. About the accidents, they fluctuated gradually until the latter of 2004, the data increased slowly and reached 3.5% in the final
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems what are the problems what can be done to solve the problems 56
- Spoken communication is more important than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In the modern world people are no longer necessary to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed slowly and reached 3.5% in the final
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 896.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81720430108 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7096134145 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2396769438 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138119384146 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632101309423 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570721873943 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996710476963 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492589384733 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.