Employers are reluctant to take on people over the age of 50 because they are of the opinion that older employees are too set in their ways and are not responsive to a world that is changing so swiftly. For this reason they prefer younger workers. Is this a fair judgment?
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
It is a common belief that, older people cannot adapt to the rapidly changing world, this is a common myth which I don’t believe.
First of all if we look at the FORBES 500 list, which shows us the wealthiest 500 firms across the world, we can clearly see that most of the CEO are above 50 years. Although adaptation and flexibility to new risky environment is advantage, for most of the big companies, staying in a calm position on a market crisis, is also as important as rapid adaptation.
As a second aspect, working for years brings also wide experience which is not written in books. A young employee can be very enthusiastic about his job, but sometimes it is good to get tricks from old wolf.
Another argument focuses on unemployment of young people, and justifies that if old people are fired or forced to retire, there will be more available places for young employees. Although it seems rational in first look, this is also contradictory to loyalty of someones to the company where he is working. This decreases someone's joy of working and their productivity. Nobody can concentrate to what they do, if they knew that, the older they get, the more they are likely to be fired. This is also a kind of discrimination which in the long run can undermine the whole working environment. Moreover, this argument does not decreases the unemployment rate, it just shifts the age of unemployed people.
To sum up, in an ideal working environment, the job should be given to someone who deserves it. This is not correlated with someone's age. Moreover, the fact that young people are better employees just because of their adaption skills were true, most of the companies will be bankrupted since most of general managers or CEO are older than 50.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender? 59
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his job, but sometimes it is good to get tricks from old wolf. Another argume...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is good to get tricks from old wolf. Another argument focuses on unemployment...
^^^
Line 7, column 626, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decrease'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: decrease
...nment. Moreover, this argument does not decreases the unemployment rate, it just shifts t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 626, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'decrease'
Suggestion: decrease
...nment. Moreover, this argument does not decreases the unemployment rate, it just shifts t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... correlated with someones age. Moreover, the fact that young people are better em...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, thus, kind of, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77777777778 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68731592491 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584967320261 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7896699874 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.428571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183510069199 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597299854897 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498620353786 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0926865433176 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047640061978 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.