Consumption of Fast Food by Australian teenagers
The given line graph illustrates how many times per year the Australian youngsters ate fast food, which was divided into three categories, between 1975 and 2000.
Overall, there was an upward trend in most categories of food except for fish and chips. Another striking feature is that the period surveyed witnessed the most noticeable growth in consuming hamburgers.
As can be inferred from the chart that, initially, the pizza consumption ranked last with 5 times, which was half of the times hamburgers consumed. Over a decade, in 1985 the gap between pizza and hamburgers widened significantly, with the former’s figure experiencing a surge of 75 times compared to a gradual increment 30 times of the latter’s. In the last year of the surveyed spell, the number of times pizza consumed by the young in Australia reached the level of about 85, which was 15 times less than the hamburger’s rate.
In contrast, it is apparent that posterior to declining to 85 times from the initial point of 100 times in 1980 , the fish and chips consumption underwent a slight upturn to 95 times five years later. Afterwards, the number of times this fast food eaten diminished sustainably by roughly 55 times to the trough of under 40 times, ending the period with the last rank.
- Consumption of Fast Food by Australian teenagers 89
- Children are now less active in their free time than in the past Therefore sports lessons must be compulsory in schools To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or exper 78
- The maps show southside a shopping mall as it is now and plans for its development 84
- The world health organization recommends that people should eat five or more portions of fruit and vegetables per day The bar chart shows the percentage of males and females in the UK by age group in 2006 73
- In many places people s lifestyle is changing rapidly and this affects family relationships Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...m the initial point of 100 times in 1980 , the fish and chips consumption underwen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, except for, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93023255814 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71728892871 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618604651163 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7582772382 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127392130496 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565843060175 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575165570588 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871646737002 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579479466582 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.