The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The drawing demonstrates the main stages which take place in the process of manufacturing sugar cane.
Overall, it is noticeable that the drawing involves a total of seven stages opening with planting and ending with drying and cooling.
At the beginning of the process, the sugar canes are planted and it takes 12 - 18 months for them to grow. After being fully grown, they are harvested either mechanically or manually. The manual harvest involves the farmer removing the leaves and chopping the stalks, while the mechanized method uses the machine to cut the canes directly. The sugar canes are then crushed in a mill to extract the juice, which is later on purified using the limestone filter.
At the fifth stage of the process, the purified juice is boiled in an evaporator and then turns into syrup. Subsequent to that, the syrup is poured into a centrifuge to seperate sugar crystals from syrup. Finally, the crystals are dried and cooled and the end result is sugar.
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries will not be needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- More and more prisons are being built to house the world s criminals many people believe long term imprisonment is the answer to solving the crime problem However others feel that psychological assistance is what is required Discuss both views and give yo 82
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: SUBSEQUENT_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'after'
Suggestion: After
...n evaporator and then turns into syrup. Subsequent to that, the syrup is poured into a centri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89156626506 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47134969046 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620481927711 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8079039575 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.2222222222 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186285175211 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792381391186 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724497136075 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114566785625 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807170734726 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.