The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

You should write at least 150 words

The given picture illustrates about the manufacturing procedure of carbonated drinks.

The whole method of preparing carbonated drinks divided into five stages starting from water cleansing to delivery to supermarkets.

Starting from step one, which includes purifying raw water and then chemicals are added to soften water in big chamber.

In second stage, soft water pumped in to electric heater, where water evaporation process take place and water evaporised. After that hot water air passes through cooling pipe where it is coolen and enter into a chamber where carbon dioxide is added for carbonation of water.

Furthermore, the third is a mixing stage. Here different colors, syrup and flavour are mixed with carbonated water and again it is fitered. Now water is ready for filling in bottles as well as cans and packed in parcels which is the fourth stage of this process. lastly packed water bottles are delivered to supermarkets to sell to customers.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-05-14 kevann 78 view
2022-05-14 kevann 61 view
2022-05-14 kevann 78 view
2022-05-14 kevann 56 view
2021-12-23 khanh_uyen 61 view
Essays by user sailor :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...de is added for carbonation of water Furthermore the third is a mixing stage Here differ...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, lastly, second, so, then, third, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18709677419 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57269743895 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 155.0 22.4926829268 689% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 804.0 112.824112599 713% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 155.0 22.9334400587 676% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 66.0 5.23603664747 1260% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0785220187563 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785220187563 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0537192078124 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393339410018 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 80.5 13.2329268293 608% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -94.31 61.2550243902 -154% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 64.9 10.3012195122 630% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.01 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.81 8.06136585366 196% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 60.0 11.4329268293 525% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 64.0 10.9970731707 582% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 60.0 11.0658536585 542% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.