The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town

Essay topics:

The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town

The picture below demonstrates the method of gathering rainwater for the purpose of making drinkable water in a town in Australia.

Overall, the process consists of four main stages, beginning with the collection of impure water resources, and ending with the drinkable water resource.
At the beginning of the process, a large amount of precipitation slid off the rooftops, and then, thanks to the roof gutter, the following rainwater flowed into the adjacent water pipe in order to funnel into the underground water systems. Once this stream of water underwent filtration to remove all sediments and impurities, the initial stage of quality was verified. After being filtered, the processed water flows into the large container before running through the storage tank.

The process continues with rainwater bumped into the water treatment tank, which conducts the addition of chemical components to make sure that the water not only is safe from bacteria and germs but also make it fit for consumption. Finally, the fresh water is introduced into another series of underground pipes connecting to the apartment and is ready to be drunk from the taps.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-21 honguyenlily 89 view
2024-01-18 honguyenlily 89 view
2023-11-06 tracywu 73 view
2023-10-19 reverjae 89 view
2023-10-19 reverjae 61 view
Essays by user Jann :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28108108108 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68866625365 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616216216216 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2643456249 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.571428571 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183325833333 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888226456899 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525210020519 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125138709875 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396622790511 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.