The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the number of barrels of oil production and consumption in China between the years 1982 and 2006.
Overall, the number of barrels of oil production increased slightly, whilst the number of barrels of oil consumption was a sharp increase over the twenty-four years.
In 1982, the amount of oil production and consumption was the same nearly at about 2 million barrels per day, then it changed clearly. The number of barrels of oil production rose suddenly at 3 million barrels per day in 1986, whereas the number of barrels of oil consumption remained stable from the years 1986 to 1990.
During sixteen years from 1990 to 2006, the number of barrels of oil consumption went up dramatically from 2 million to over 3 million barrels per day in 1994, then reach a peak at over 6 million barrels per day in 2006. In contrast, the figures for production just climbed roughly over 3 million barrels per day in 2006. That means, people in China consumed at a higher rate than it is production.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-26 | Kiwi | view | |
| 2022-06-26 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | Hamza khan1 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Sayansh Garg | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-22 | Sayansh Garg | 73 | view |
- The table below shows thenumbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 89
- The table below shows thenumbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 73
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 Summarize the information by describing the main features of the charts and making comparisons where appropriate
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 67
- the diagrams below give information about two main road tunnels in one Australian city 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line chart compares the number of ba...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75706214689 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63132522704 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45197740113 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4142835158 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162049616313 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112671250993 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902455273099 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154375280178 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997834933647 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line chart compares the number of ba...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75706214689 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63132522704 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45197740113 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4142835158 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162049616313 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112671250993 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902455273099 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154375280178 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997834933647 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.