The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010.

The diagrams given depict the modernization of the village of Seaville located in a coastal area over a period of 30 years from 1980 to 2010.
It is noticeable from the pictures that the village underwent some significant transformations with the most typical one was the constructions of a lot of amenities. Additionally, the woodland was converted into a golf course.
In 1980, in the eastern area, there was an East Bank, which was adjacent to a river. At the same time, sand dunes were flanked by a tea room to the west and the river to the east, whereas the marsh was surrounded by roads. Similarly, a hotel was located to the south of the marsh and next to a holiday cottages to the north
To 2010, while the East Bank, the river and the hotel still existed in the positions where they used to be in 1980, there were the introductions of a restaurant and a new hotel, which were relative to the disapperances of the tea room and the sand dunes. Similarly, a boat club and a retirement village were erected in the poitions next to the river. By contrast, the marsh was demolised to make way for the construction of permanent houses, accompanied by the substitution of the golf course for the woodland.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-13 tata 78 view
2024-06-13 tata 73 view
2024-06-13 tata 80 view
2024-06-04 trpg143 78 view
2024-05-14 123456abcxyz 11 view
Essays by user vuhungbo :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on of the golf course for the woodland.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, so, still, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58525345622 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83959977666 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516129032258 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.4925983638 43.030603864 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.375 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158949049372 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739429871528 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116503934454 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127892797183 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143730189549 0.0819641961636 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.