The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate the evolution of the horse, especially in terms of the foot stucture, over a 40-million-year duration.
It is evident from the diagrams that there are 4 main stages of the development shown. Additionally, it commences with the step called Eohippus and ends with the modern horse.
About 40 years ago, the horse was known as Eohippus, which was quite small and had a foot structure of four digits. To 30 million years ago, the size of the Mesohippus was larger compared to that of Eohippus. In addtion, a noticeable change was that the structure of foot encompassed three toes .
The next stage of the development was called Mecrychippus, which happened around 15 million years ago. During this stage, whereas the size of Mecrychippus did not undergo any significant shift, its foot structure was divided into segments and the middle digit was more larger, which made it come more outstanding. Up to now, the modern Horse is bigger and has more fur on its head. Besides that, three toes in the foot structure of Mecrychippus have been substituted by one large digit.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...structure of foot encompassed three toes . The next stage of the development was...
^^
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'larger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: larger
... into segments and the middle digit was more larger, which made it come more outstanding. U...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94565217391 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7997495453 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614130434783 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5367819612 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132269728416 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641470736 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644775619472 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10033150592 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051388882215 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...structure of foot encompassed three toes . The next stage of the development was...
^^
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'larger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: larger
... into segments and the middle digit was more larger, which made it come more outstanding. U...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94565217391 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7997495453 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614130434783 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.5367819612 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132269728416 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641470736 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644775619472 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10033150592 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051388882215 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.