Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging food. While other argue that customer should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion
In the light of proliferation of the 21st century, convenient goods are no longer strange with users. Nevertheless, a group of people strongly believe that items appeared with fabulous and attractive packaging should be eased immediately by producers as well as supermarkets. On the other hand, a number of individuals think that customers should minimize the utilization of goods possessing numerous packaging. I will further discuss both views although I support the first statement for several reasons. First, it is extremely vital that manufacturers and stores pay more attention to reduce the number of packaging items with a view to protecting the environment proactively. Although the academic levels of dwellers are improved gradually, there are numerous individuals who are lack of awareness about the environment as they do not understand the drawbacks of packaging goods and still take advantage of them. Therefore, producers belong with supermarkets should put step forward to decrease the adverse trend in exploiting without limitation packaging items of citizens. As a result, the environment issues should be eased. Furthermore, reducing packaging of goods can assist manufacturers in saving budget which is utilized for materials of the items'outlook. Therefore, they can focus on improving the quality of the product and gain better profits. On the other hand, customers should avoid using packaging food to arise others awareness in protecting the environment. Due to the good understanding of producers with buyers, they can easily take advantage of packaging to attract more costumers that packaging goods are manufactured commonly and worldwide without thinking about detrimental disadvantages. Therefore, costumers should be more proactively in choosing items that using disposing materials for the packaging to share a hand with government to preserve the environment. In conclusion, both manufacturers and users play an essential role in laying the groundwork for the fewer use of packaging items. As a result, the environment can be better and people' lives can be flourished.
- The charts below show the percentage of Australian men and women in three age groups who were employed in 1984 2001 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams show the structure of a solar panel and its use Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- In many countries not enough students study science subjects What are the causes What will be the effect on society Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- The table below shows the percentage of adults in urban and rural areas who took part in four free time activities in 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information and compare where relevant by selecting and reporting the key features 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 776, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...adually, there are numerous individuals who are lack of awareness about the environment...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60377358491 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17224375075 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531446540881 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0422904953 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.8 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303380239942 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102540485734 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598464725088 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303380239942 0.151304729494 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.