How should we ensure that television is a positive influence in the life of children?
The invention of television is one of the greatest invention in the 20th century. With TV, the developments of the world are becoming accessible to children, which helps them broaden their knowledge. Conversely, parents should be careful on the uses of TV by children to ensure they have positive consequences to their sons and daughters.
The television brings many advantages to young users. To begin with, TV is a good platform for kids to explore the world. Although kids are at home, they can get information about all parts of the world. For instance, a city child may not know how is an insect look like, so they focus on attractive wildlife programs on TV to figure out it’s appearance. Many programs are well designed that activates children’s curiosity and they seem never fed up with watching these programs. Secondly, TV is also an entertainment device which helps children relaxed after study. Funny TV shows, fairytales etc. are the most popular among infants. Furthermore, in case their parents all go out to work, then children are left at home with a TV will make them feel less lonely and scared.
However, to ensure these benefits happened, parents should control their uses of TV. Firstly, they should restrict their children’s TV using time. The appropriate way to do this is to set a time limit for these devices, one and a half hours is a suitable using period for each day and two hours would be the maximum. In addition, they should plan a weekly TV using schedule for their daughters and sons to get the best profit from television. Secondly, to avoid the overuse of TV, which may leads to distinct serious drawbacks such as obesity, shortsighted etc. parents should encourage teenagers to do more outdoors activities instead of watching TV all days. Last but not least, restriction for under 18 users is a must set for the TV. Parents should limit the number of channels that the children can access to avoid contents which are not suitable for kids.
In conclusion, I would argue that television is a profitable device for children if their parents can rationally control their usage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-03 | heyrawrr | 71 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | lilyaa2910 | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-18 | namviet | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-26 | Ngoc Trinh | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | akorn99 | 78 | view |
- How should we ensure that television is a positive influence in the life of children 73
- In recent years some countries have experienced very rapid economic development This has resulted in much higher standards of living in urban areas but not in the countryside This situation may bring some problems for the country as a whole What are these 84
- As children become adults their social behaviour changes in some ways What are the main differences between young children s social behaviour and that of adults To what extent are the changes that take place good 73
- Some young people look forward to a year of traveling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Parents
...acks such as obesity, shortsighted etc. parents should encourage teenagers to do more o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89473684211 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67494520214 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551246537396 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3960842894 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1428571429 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1904761905 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154501773361 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513020033298 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516427977614 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112119934361 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446185166595 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.