The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of
digital games between 2000 and 2006.
The bar chart depicts the global consumption in billions of dollars of various kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006.
Overall, the global sales of handheld games was the highest during the research period. Additionally, the amount of almost all types of games sold experienced an upward trend except from console games over a 7-year period.
The quantity of handheld games consumption witnessed a moderate growth from a roughly 11 billion dollars turnover in 2000 to $18 billion in 2006. In contrast, the equivalent figure for console games registered a slight decline of around 3 billion dollars to 3 billion dollars in 2006.
The mobile phone games just appeared in the market in 2002 but gradually increased and got over the online games and console games to become the second most popular digital games in 2005 of 6 billion dollars for global sales. However, the similar figure for online games saw a consistent jump from 2005 to 2006 and reached a peak of 9 billion dollars turnover in 2006.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-24 | Ahihi12 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | kavi jk | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | celine ayoub | 67 | view |
- To what extent has the Internet made life more convenient give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 56
- How should we ensure that television is a positive influence in the life of children 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems 73
- As children become adults their social behaviour changes in some ways What are the main differences between young children s social behaviour and that of adults To what extent are the changes that take place good 73
- Some young people look forward to a year of traveling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50013148443 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511764705882 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6844903795 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418095034298 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217610658786 0.103423049105 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888060079294 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280169292698 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08698133327 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.