Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that the internet is a perfect tool for students and workers to reach their targets easier than before. Personally, I strongly agree with this view.
It is understandable why some believe that the internet has a negative impact on people. The principal reason for this is that the internet is one of a reason for the lack of communication as many people spend too much time chatting on social media rather than spending time talking directly with others. Also, the internet can cause distraction as the appearance of attractive sites or programs. However, I believe that this view is flawed. In fact, there are hundreds of online social platforms created to help students and workers improve their communication such as Zoom, Google Meet, or Skype. With the development of technology recently, online networking websites can allow users to call directly with others using video which improves the reactivity for customers.
In addition, I am strongly convinced that internet access supports people to be successful in their education and career. This is because online networking has a huge amount of information that benefits students and workers in searching for data and statistics. Students can easily solve their assignments using the information searched on the internet. Another reason is that the internet can help workers improve their financial status as there are numerous investing websites that help them to earn more money. As a result, the internet is a critical factor contributing to the success of people as its usefulness.
In conclusion, there are sufficient grounds to reject the view that the internet can be a harm to users as it causes problems related to communication. It is my genuine belief that the internet plays an important role in the success of people with its convenience.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1610738255 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84182028375 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520134228188 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1735419122 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.533333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2118064035 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725659110972 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552035705106 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133306213669 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672489882911 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.