Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It is scientifically claimed that all nations around the world will use the same language in the future. In my opinion, this is both positive and negative.
On the positive side, the synchronous use of language contributes to cross-cultural communication as well as verbal communication between people in different countries. This creates an opportunity for better cultural propagation as it will be easier for people to understand other people from other nations. In others aspects of global communication, such as science or economy, recognizing a common language erases communication barriers and improves global trading across the world. This can devote to the revolution of the world economy. Taking English as an example for the common language used globally, English boost efficiency as well as prevent incomprehension. Also, the exchange of information on transaction contracts or agreements will be tremendously prompted. As a result, there would be little need for manuals to be written in different languages.
On the negative side, if global civilians adopted international language, this would be an erase of minority cultures. If the extinction of others languages happens, people will live a simple and monotonous world. Moreover, some individuals, the young generation, in particular, may underestimate the value and meaning of their expression, greatly damaging the traditions and identity of their nations. For example, if people around the world speak the same voice, tourists will no longer have an opportunity to enjoy the rich historical heritage of other nations.
In conclusion, the prediction that in the future, humans will use the same language for communication can pose dangers as well as benefits at the same time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d international language, this would be an erase of minority cultures. If the extinction...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52788104089 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19798550485 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550185873606 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.897347829 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.214285714 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187076080044 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692170806095 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478467616838 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142291547806 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396058916664 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.