Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)
Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health
The line graph compares the amount of acid in the mouth after consuming three types of sweet, which can cause toothache, based on pH values
Overall, after 5 minutes of being eaten, all of these sweet foods will cause higher acidity in the mouth, with reductions in pH and higher chances of tooth decay then end up with the same pH values after two-fifth of an hour
Regarding the first 5 minutes, all kinds of sweet significantly decline in their pH levels at which level toothache occurs with no more than 5pH. After another 5 minutes, while fruit and cane sugar's pH witness approximately 0.5pH increase, the figure for honey remains the same.
There is a similar upward trend recorded in the production of acid in the mouth of people who eat fruit and cane sugar in later minutes until they join together at their beginning pH level of 7pH, which people are unlikely to have tooth decay. On the other hand, honey's acidity rises more radically from 10 minutes to 25 minutes after being eaten with a growth of around 2.5 pH, then it stays unchanged before reaching the same pH level as others at the end
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | cupinsiuway | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-21 | Wisnu Legowo | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | Hamza khan1 | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-31 | khuekhue | 78 | view |
| 2021-04-13 | Dida18 | 56 | view |
- The pie charts show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010 73
- the bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 84
- Because computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately learning a foreign language is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 918.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63636363636 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25478891557 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616161616162 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 49.0 22.4926829268 218% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 144.390096613 43.030603864 336% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 229.5 112.824112599 203% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 49.5 22.9334400587 216% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283500599248 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151416186151 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932338518649 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185438655596 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523112267332 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.2 13.2329268293 190% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.0 10.3012195122 194% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.52 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.4329268293 232% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 21.6 10.9970731707 196% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.