Essay topics: The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time

Essay topics:

Essay topics: The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.

The line graphs presents the amount of budgets parents spending on their children’s sporting activities and the number of British children who took part in three sports from 2008 to 2014.
It is noticeable that parents invested more and more money each year in children’s sports over the six-year period. In terms of the number of children taking part, football attracted significantly more people than athletics or swimming.
In 2008, British parents spent an average of 20 pounds per month on children’s sporting activities. This figure increased gradually over the following six years, reaching over 30 pounds by 2014.
Looking at the participation numbers, in 2008 approximately 8 million British children played football, while just about 2 million children were enrolled in swimming clubs and less than 1 million practiced athletics. The number of children participation in football relatively remained unchanged over the following six years. By contrast, the respective figure for swimming doubled to nearly 4 million and there was a near fivefold increase in the number of children doing athletics.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-03 cindycornelia98 67 view
2019-11-09 marin123 73 view
2019-11-04 pritam 67 view
2019-10-06 skelly 73 view
2019-10-05 rohitbangari27@gmail.com 67 view
Essays by user Crystal sefynn :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5523255814 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03946348736 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8253436926 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.375 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362307628259 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15910825321 0.103423049105 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984167668315 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231040791676 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080988733292 0.0819641961636 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.