The graph and the table below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1994 to 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph and the table given compare Australia in terms of the proportion of inhabitants keen on going to cinemas and the average cinema visits by distinct age groups over a period of 6 years from 1994 to 2002.
It is evident from the table that local citizens gradually became interested in visiting cinemas. Additionally, an oscillating trend was recorded in all the categories of the graph.
Regarding the table, in 1994, the figure for cinema attendants accounted for 67% of the total population, whereas it had undergone an minimal increase to 70% in 2000 before continuing climbing up insignificantly to 72% in 2002. About the level of frequency, the number of average visits in 1994 stood at 10.7. Likewise, in 1996, this nation witnessed a marginal growth in the quantity of average visits to 11.3, at which it started to drop steadily to 8.3 in 2002.
In terms of the graph, in 1994, individuals aged 14-24 was by far the most the enthusiastic group visiting cinemas, with approximately 12 average visits, while the numbers of 25-34 and 50+ were dwarfed by that of 14-24, at exactly 10 and about 9 in turn. Similarly, there were around 8 average visits made by 35-49-year-old residents. In 2002, after having experienced fluctuations, the figure for the attendance made by those aged 14-24 went up slowly to exactly 10 and remained the peak of the graph. Meanwhile, the quantities of 25-34 and 50+ fluctuated to the point at which they shared a comparable figure of 8 visits, accompanied by oscillations seen in the number of visits made by 35-49-year-old inhabitants to approximately 5.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...s of the proportion of inhabitants keen on going to cinemas and the average cinema visit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...al population, whereas it had undergone an minimal increase to 70% in 2000 before ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, regarding, similarly, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 33.7804878049 189% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 270.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93703703704 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98557345145 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551851851852 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.5158874764 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.111111111 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258123568654 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109272561711 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094923469143 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181222654141 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106798150115 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.