The first chart below shows the percentages of women and men in a country involved in some kinds (cooking, cleaning, pet caring and repairing the house). The second chart show the amount of time each gender spent on each task per day. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts given compare a nation in terms of the proportion of males and females engaging in doing distict types of house chores and how much time they spent accomplishing each task per day.
It is clear from the first chart that women were prone to cook. Additionally, the second one indicates that females spared more time for completing tasks compared to males.
In the first chart, doing cooking was the most popular kind of house chores among women, at 80%, compared to 60% of them cleaning. Meanwhile, the rates of pet care and house repairs were 4 and 8 times as low as that of cooking, at 20% and nearly 10% respectively. About men, 60% of males completing cooking, followed by only 40% and over 20% of them doing cleaning and pet care in turn. Likewise, the proportion of house repairs constituted approximately one fifth of 100 % of the total.
The second chart illustrates that females tended to spend time cooking, at over 80 minutes each day, whereas exactly 60 minutes spared by males for doing this. Conversely, about cleaning, the figures for women and men were nearly 65 and 45 minutes in that order. The number of minutes used by males to care pets shared the comparable figues with that of females, at 20 minutes. By contrast, there are about 17 minutes spent by men repairing houses, compared to nearly 5 minutes used by women.
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 84
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagram shows Lakeside development between years 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, likewise, second, whereas, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70168067227 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48381959492 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554621848739 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4039585379 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.727272727 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277448547735 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109431214969 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510683475706 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178188062404 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251695795763 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.