The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in UK from 1970 to 1990
The graph shows the comparison of the weekly consumption of three type of fast foods in UK between 1970 and 1990.
It is evident that amount of Fish and Chips were the most popular fast food. Although Piza was the only option of fast food at the first time, this fast food chosen was slight decrease during the period.
In 1970, the amount of Piza consumed was highest, at more than 300 grams, while the figure for Hamburger was significantly lower, at only around 30 grams. Meanwhile, approximately 80 grams of Fish & Chips was eaten by UK people. In 1985, Piza consumption slightly fell and reached the lowest point of 200grams, whereas the other two figure gradually went up.
In 1990, Fish and Chips weekly consumption was a dramatic increase to 500 grams and became the highest fast food chosen, while Hamburger’s figure experienced a slight rise to about 300 grams. At the same time, the amount of Piza eaten remained stable at roughly 200 grams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-28 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2024-03-20 | lethianhthu | 80 | view |
| 2024-03-04 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph shows the comparison of the we...
^^^
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'figure' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'figures'.
Suggestion: figures
...oint of 200grams, whereas the other two figure gradually went up. In 1990, Fish and C...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80722891566 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51911548859 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590361445783 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0341650968 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26453522722 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13602135814 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163966675821 0.0843802449381 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225982709285 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189545805662 0.0819641961636 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.