The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990

The line graph illustrates how many grams of junk food was being consumed, over two decades, from 1970 to 1990, by the Britain's.

Overall, the amount of fast food namely hamburgers and pizza eaten went up drastically in this 20 years period; however the consumption of fish and chips experienced a decline of 1/3 by the year 1990.

With regards to hamburger, about 90 g very eaten per week by the masses of UK, the figures rose steadily for the following 10 years and reached 150 g, in 1980. A sharp increase was seen during the year 1985 and 1990 as the figures surged three fold and five fold respectively. Pizza, in the meantime, echoed the same trend and reached just below 300 g per week from approximately 50 g per week by starting of 20th century.

Conversely, the rate of consumption of fish and chips tumbled to two thirds of the value in 1970, followed by a collective of around 200 g of consumption per week within the period 1980 to 1990.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54913294798 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58405424918 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618497109827 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.3262403319 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.166666667 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355435590693 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148441533631 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646267328694 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187579524284 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034693636101 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.