The given trend line explains consumption of fish and different kind of meet items in a Europian country from 1979 to 2004.
The given trend line explains consumption of fish and different kind of meet items in a Europian country from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it can be observed that fish consumption trend has decreased somehow during observation period. However, beef and lamb meet consumption rate is decreasing in a high ratio. On the other hand chicken meet uses per person per week have rapidly growing.
Horizontal axis presents per person consumption of meats and fish in a week and vertical axis shows the observation period from 1979 to 2004. The given data shows that there is not significant change in fish consumption. In 1979 fish consumption was about 60 grams whereas about 45 grams in 2004. Similarly, lamb meat consumption trend line has declining in a fast rate. In 1979 it was about 150 grams but in 2004 it decreased to about 60 grams only. Likewise, consumption of beef meat also decline in consumption after 1084. In between 1079 to 1984 there was fluctuation. The interesting fact is that consumption of chicken meat has been rapidly increasing while other meats and fish are in declining trend. In 1979 it was lower than beef i.e. about 95 grams and almost 210 grams respectively. But in 2004 rate of chicken consumption raised to 250 grams.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 67
- An informal letter 89
- The table illustrates the nature of national consumer expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three categories of consumer product in 2002. 56
- he chart bellow shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 67
- The table illustrates the nature of national consumer expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey on three categories of consumer product in 2002. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ish and different kind of meet items in a Europian country from 1979 to 2004. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, likewise, similarly, so, whereas, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8820754717 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70905470489 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8773670054 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.9285714286 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1428571429 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433349166179 0.215688989381 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160766166083 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.23735773884 0.0843802449381 281% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.458854943854 0.15604864568 294% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.384983384728 0.0819641961636 470% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.84 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.