The grap below give information about the number of cases of diarhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992.
The graph represents data how the number of cases of diarhea changed over the period from 1983 and 1992 in Mashhad.Units are measured in millions of diarhea.
Overall, cases of diarhea figures in Mashhad was fluctuated between 1983 - 1992. Besides, there were at the highest level in 1989 while, the weakest figure could be observed in 1992.
At the beginning of the three years remained relatively static ( just over 100 million diarhea) After then, this level has been a gradual increase in 200 million between 1985-1987. However, the trend followed by a signaficant plummet to 100 million diarhea in 1989. After which, the positive trend reveal and peak at 400 million diarhea in 1989. In contrast, the cases of diarhea in 1989 year has experienced a considerable rocket to 200 million diarhea than the 1989 year. After, over the three years, came with a small decline in 350 million diarhea in Mashhad. Lastly, the in 1992, become a rapid plunge and reach unsignaficant level off ( 0 million diarhea).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ber of cases of diarhea changed over the period from 1983 and 1992 in Mashhad.Uni...
^^
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Units
...e period from 1983 and 1992 in Mashhad.Units are measured in millions of diarhea. ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1983 - 1992. Besides, there were at the highest level in 1989 while, the weakest...
^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e three years remained relatively static just over 100 million diarhea After then...
^^
Line 5, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., this level has been a gradual increase in 200 million between 1985-1987. Howeve...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 643, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...plunge and reach unsignaficant level off 0 million diarhea.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, lastly, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98214285714 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54019195927 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9754764173 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256303835856 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130869980371 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115558237215 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227571307454 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682148884359 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.