The graph above shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph illustrats the amount of fish and deffrent kinds of meat conumption by per person per week in European country from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, the consumption of beef, lamb and fish ware decreased while the chicken consumption was increased throughout the period. Fish consumption was still same in those period.
At the beginning of the period, per week each European people eat around 220 gram Beef which was the highest amount consumption in 1979. It slightly increased to about 230 grams in 1989 and then it dramatically decline reached almost 100 grams in 2004. Fish was the lowest consumption in 1979 which was over 50 grams and it decreased to about 40 gram which was the lowest amount of consumption at the end of the period.
On the other hand,in European country per people consume chicken and lamb was around 150 gram in 1979. The amount of chicken consumption was dramatically increased to about 250 grams in 2000. The consumption of lamb was 150 grams in 1979 and it significantly decline to about 80 grams in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 67
- Women are better at childcare than men therefore they should focus more on raising children and less on their working life To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 76
- The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 67
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the green house gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'declines'?
Suggestion: declines
... grams in 1989 and then it dramatically decline reached almost 100 grams in 2004. Fish ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...r 50 grams and it decreased to about 40 gram which was the lowest amount of consumpt...
^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...end of the period. On the other hand,in European country per people consume chi...
^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...consume chicken and lamb was around 150 gram in 1979. The amount of chicken consumpt...
^^^^
Line 7, column 260, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'declines'?
Suggestion: declines
... 150 grams in 1979 and it significantly decline to about 80 grams in 2000.
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntly decline to about 80 grams in 2000.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84444444444 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6206445348 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427777777778 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7583746714 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8888888889 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219635864159 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113793479237 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779480068747 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170470013464 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862303998055 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.38 8.06136585366 79% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.