the graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040.
The line graph below shows the percentage of the four Asian countries' populations " Malaysia , Philippines , Thailand, and Indonesia" living in its cities since 1970 until 2020. In addition to the predictions for the next upcoming 10-20 years "2030-2040". .
In the 1970s, Philippines seemed to have the highest rate of 32 percent but that didn't last as it witnessed a slight fall after the 90s. Meanwhile on the other hand, Indonesia was marked with the lowest percentage amongst them all with almost thirty per but not after it reached 50% fifty years later. However, after Philippines stepped back from the first place, Malaysia came and got placed with the highest rate out of the other countries "70 per cent in 2020" after noticing a dramatic increase and therefore goes Thailand with the change of percentage starting from 20 per in the 70s then climbing few more in 2020.
The assumptions on the graph were clear that Malaysia will still be with the highest rate for the next two decades even reaching 80% and there will also Indonesia continue growing to be the second highest followed by Philippines. But Thailand is claimed to mark the lowest of the mall even after 20 years reaching forty percent.
Overall, it seems that Malaysia might become the most lived country out of the previously mentioned countries in the future and Thailand might be the least
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 80
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting 78
- Some people say that adertising is extremely successful at pursuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss bothe these views and give your opinion 84
- The diagram shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 89
- The process shows diamonds moving from the mine to the retailer 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'graphs'.
Suggestion: graphs
The line graph below shows the percentage of the four ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...an countries populations ' Malaysia , Philippines , Thailand, and Indonesia&a...
^^
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...opulations ' Malaysia , Philippines , Thailand, and Indonesia' living in...
^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ming 10-20 years '2030-2040'. . In the 1970s, Philippines seemed to h...
^
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...the highest rate of 32 percent but that didnt last as it witnessed a slight fall afte...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
... witnessed a slight fall after the 90s. Meanwhile on the other hand, Indonesia was marked...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, then, therefore, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1166.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04761904762 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77625204647 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597402597403 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.5878777758 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.75 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.875 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258446556766 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103663363513 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101184127306 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15005367788 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11523274493 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.