The chart and the graph show the number of new graduates and the their employment in the UK from 1992 to 2002
The graph and the chart given compare the UK in terms of the number of graduates and which occupations they preferred to do over a period of 10 years from 1992 to 2002.
It is clear from the graph that the figure for new graduates underwent a slight increase despite a drop in 1997. Additionally, professional position was the most widely-preferred jobs among the UK’s new workers.
Regarding the graph, in 1992, this nation welcomed exactly 165,000 new graduates. Conversely, the quantity of those having just graduated experienced a substantial decline to about 180,000 in 2002 after having gone up to 195,000 in 1997.
In terms of occupations, the UK’s new graduates prioritized to work in professional position, at nearly 60%, which outnumbered the shares of Managerical & Administrative and Clerical & Secretarical by nearly three and six to one, at 20% and approximately 10% in turn. Meanwhile, over 5% of graduates employed for other jobs, compared to around 5% of them opting for sales. To 2002, the percentage of professional declined insignificantly to over 40% and remained the most appealing destination, whereas that of Managerical & Administrative underwent a steady decrease to nearly 18% in 1997, at which point it remained stable to 2002. At the same time, this nation witnessed gradual increases to 20% and 10% in the rate of Clerical & Secretarical and Sales respective. Likewise, that of other matched with a roughly similar trend to 10%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, likewise, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20338983051 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19135115934 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4785679749 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.8 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294137894371 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107888886113 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100096169037 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198957229248 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984908979177 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.