The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000.
The line graph illustrates the amount of electricity production from three different sources of energy which New Yorkers used from 1980 to 2000.
Overall, the number of people in New York who consumed petroleum and natural gas increased enormously over the period shown. In contrast, there was a considerable decline in the figures for ones who used coal in this city.
Consumed about 350kwh by New Yorkers in 1980, Petroleum was by far the highest sources of energy which supplied New York city. New York experienced a sharp fluctuation in the amount of electricity production from petroleum before rocking sharply over the last period of 10 years and reached a peak of 700kwh in the last year.
Turning to coal and natural gas, from 1980 to 1985, New York witnessed a climb up in the number of people using coal. However, there was a period of stability in the amount of electricity produced from natural gas before it surged significantly and overtook that from coal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-16 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-14 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-04-14 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-14 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | minhtran224 | view |
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 67
- The bar chart shows the information of the number of volunteers and paid workers in 4 different roles in the sports sector of an Australian town in 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91515151515 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62282136624 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509090909091 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1979861472 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356910085061 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169482483748 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130150305428 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233821781565 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138974195032 0.0819641961636 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.