The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph represents how much carbon dioxide (CO2) each individual produced on average in four European nations between 1967 and 2007, with the data assessed in metric tons.
In general, the UK emitted the most CO2 throughout the period. Despite starting in second place, pollution in Sweden fell drastically and became the most eco-friendly on the list.
On the one hand, the UK held the highest average CO2 emissions (nearly 11 tons) in 1967. Having stayed constant in the first decade, the figure declined steadily to roughly 9 tons until 2007. Regarding Sweden, the quantity reached a peak at above 10 tons in the first decade. Since then, it hit a trough, going down to around 7 tons in 1987 and below 6 tons at the end.
By contrast, there was an upward trend in carbon pollution in the last 2 nations. For example, each Portuguese citizen was responsible for around 1.5 tons of CO2 in 1967. It saw an increase over the timeline, finishing at almost 7 tons, beyond thrice the initial data. This paralleled the growth in Italy, climbing approximately from 4 to 8 tons.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 78
- It is important for people to take risks in both their professional lives and personal lives Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- Sports stars are paid too much for what they do Discuss 65
- If we want to save the future of the planet we will have to drastically change our way of life What is your opinion 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, second, then, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77659574468 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53414884462 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670212765957 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.474433944 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6363636364 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0909090909 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20179868824 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639331664759 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708979565209 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116345789251 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079249589094 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.