The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line chart shows the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by every person on average in the four countries from 1967 to 2007. Overall, it is clear that the difference in carbon dioxide emissions among the four countries was much smaller in 2007 than in 1967.
In 1967, the UK emitted the most carbon dioxide, with about 11 metric tonnes. Sweden produced twice larger amount of carbon dioxide than Italy(around 8.5 metric tonnes and 4.2 metric tonnes respectively) and however, Portugal played the smallest role in carbon dioxide emissions(roughly 2 metric tonnes).
Over the period of forty years, the figure for Britain showed a decrease, reaching approximately 8.5 metric tonnes by 2007. The same trend can also be seen in that for Sweden, but it declined more significantly to nearly 5.8 metric tonnes in 2007, despite a peak at about 11 metric tonnes in 1977.
Meanwhile, the data of Italy presented an upward trend, overtaking that of Sweden in 1987, finally standing at just under 8 metric tonnes in 2007. The forty years also witnessed a rise in the number of carbon dioxide emissions in Portugal, which was at the same position as that in Sweden in 2007.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995--2002. 89
- The tables below give information about sales of Fair-trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 42
- Do you agree or disagree with the followings statement: Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 73
- Do the problems brought by international travel outweigh the advantages? 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88888888889 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53742520697 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570707070707 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3668642388 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26702516833 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130657902185 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702580363018 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169121148958 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0775924919365 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.