Uk graduates and postgraduates students who did not go to full-time work after leaving college in 2008.

Essay topics:

Uk graduates and postgraduates students who did not go to full-time work after leaving college in 2008.

The bar charts compare the destination data of graduate and postgraduate pupils in UK after finishing college in 2008.

It can be seen from the two bar charts that the number of both graduate and postgraduate students who took further study were the highest while that of voluntary work was the lowest.

The first bar chart shows that, there were 29,665 graduate pupils who kept further study, whereas there was only small number (3,500) of graduate students did voluntary work. Meanwhile there were 17,735 graduated students took part-time job, which is a little higher than that of students whose did not have job (16,235) after leaving college in 2008.

it shows in the second chart that there was only 345 postgraduate students who did voluntary works as their job, while there is much higher in number of them who were studying to get higher education (2753), which is almost the same as the number of post graduated students (2535) whose sought part-time job. It is noted that, the number of unemployed pupils was still high (1,625) after leaving college in 2008.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...f graduate students did voluntary work. Meanwhile there were 17,735 graduated students to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... job, which is a little higher than that of students whose did not have job 16,23...
^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...an that of students whose did not have job 16,235 after leaving college in 2008. ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...6,235 after leaving college in 2008. it shows in the second chart that there wa...
^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: higher
...works as their job, while there is much higher in number of them who were studying to get higher...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, so, still, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 3.15609756098 444% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92817679558 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2769000822 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508287292818 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.0939491982 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.666666667 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1666666667 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409807029349 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221056061338 0.103423049105 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527025603462 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272144277287 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659989831816 0.0819641961636 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.