The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts compare the difference in the yearly expenditure of a particular school in United Kingdom in three years.
It can be seen from the charts that the percentage of the yearly paid for salary of teacher was highest while that for insurance was lowest over the period.
Although the proportion of yearly spending of school on insurance increased steady from 2% in 1981 to 8% in 2001, this was still the lowest in comparison with that of other annual expenditures. By contrast, the percentage of annual paid for other worker’s salary showed the downward trend from 28% in 1981 to 15% in 2001.
The charts show the fluctuate in the percentage of yearly spending for other categories. The proportion of annual expenditure for teacher’s salary was 40% in 1981 then increased by 10% to reach a peak of 50% in 1991 before declined to 45% in 2001. The amount of annual investment on resources (books..) grow from 15% in 1981 to 20% in 1991 before fell down to only 9% in 2001. The figure for that of furniture and equipment dropped to 5% in 1991 before went up to 23% in 2001, which was the second highest in the annual expenditure of school in 2001.
Comments
It is really helpful, thank
It is really helpful, thank you all for your sincere help!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the highest'.
Suggestion: was the highest
...f the yearly paid for salary of teacher was highest while that for insurance was lowest ove...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the lowest'.
Suggestion: was the lowest
...er was highest while that for insurance was lowest over the period. Although the propo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...end from 28% in 1981 to 15% in 2001. The charts show the fluctuate in the per...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 17, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...to 15% in 2001. The charts show the fluctuate in the percentage of yearly spending fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 254, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...in 1991 before declined to 45% in 2001. The amount of annual investment on resourc...
^^^
Line 8, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...1991 before declined to 45% in 2001. The amount of annual investment on resources...
^^
Line 8, column 305, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... of annual investment on resources books.. grow from 15% in 1981 to 20% in 1991 be...
^^
Line 8, column 308, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Grow
... annual investment on resources books.. grow from 15% in 1981 to 20% in 1991 before ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of furniture and equipment dropped to 5% in 1991 before went up to 23% in 2001, ...
^^
Line 8, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt dropped to 5% in 1991 before went up to 23% in 2001, which was the second hig...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nnual expenditure of school in 2001.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70531400966 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67726138714 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463768115942 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.67139743 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.222222222 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318569381858 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140805068964 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590897147119 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190725965159 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958879406696 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.